Hodson v Hodson & Ors
The Deed of Partnership and subsequent conduct established that Julienne Rowlands was a partner with Neil Cloutman in Tudor Rose from 1 August 2000 to 31 July 2003; the partnership was not terminated or varied by conduct or consent prior to 31 July 2003.
- Parties
- Claimant: Paul Simon Graham Hodson; Defendant: Mark William Hodson; Defendant: Kim Marie Hodson; Defendant: Hodson (UK) Developments Ltd; Defendant: Neil Cloutman; Defendant: Tudor Rose; Defendant: Julienne Rowlands
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Preliminary Issue Determination
- Outcome
- Declaration that Julienne Rowlands was a partner in Tudor Rose from 1 August 2000 to 31 July 2003.
- Legal Topics
- Existence of Partnership, Liability of Partners, Solicitors’ Practice Rules, Professional Indemnity Insurance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Simon Graham Hodson
Claimant
Mark William Hodson
Defendant
Kim Marie Hodson
Defendant
Hodson (UK) Developments Ltd
Defendant
Neil Cloutman
Defendant
Tudor Rose
Defendant
Julienne Rowlands
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Preliminary Issue Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Julienne Rowlands was a partner with Neil Cloutman in Tudor Rose from 1 August 2000 to 31 July 2003
- 2 Whether the partnership ceased on or about 17 December 2001
Ratio Decidendi
The Deed of Partnership and subsequent conduct established that Julienne Rowlands was a partner with Neil Cloutman in Tudor Rose from 1 August 2000 to 31 July 2003; the partnership was not terminated or varied by conduct or consent prior to 31 July 2003.
Court Disposition
Declaration that Julienne Rowlands was a partner in Tudor Rose from 1 August 2000 to 31 July 2003.
Orders
- Julienne Rowlands declared to have been a partner in Tudor Rose during the specified period.
- Further argument to be heard on quantum and any other matters arising.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment