Zipher Ltd v Markem Systems Ltd & Anor
The injunction must match the scope of the undertaking given to the court, covering all patents and applications deriving from the PCT application, requiring amendment of claims to include all features of claims 1, 4, and 5 of the UK application, and prohibiting assertion or filing of wider claims, regardless of jurisdiction or parties asserted against.
- Parties
- Claimant: Zipher Limited; Defendant: Markem Systems Limited; Defendant: Markem Technologies Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 September 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Dispute / Post Judgment, Determination of Scope of Injunction
- Outcome
- Injunction granted in the form matching the undertaking, subject to drafting corrections.
- Legal Topics
- Patent Amendment, Scope of Injunction, Undertakings, International Patent Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zipher Limited
Claimant
Markem Systems Limited
Defendant
Markem Technologies Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Dispute / Post Judgment, Determination of Scope of Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Scope of injunction to enforce undertaking
- 2 Whether injunction should substitute undertaking
- 3 Mandatory versus prohibitory injunction
Ratio Decidendi
The injunction must match the scope of the undertaking given to the court, covering all patents and applications deriving from the PCT application, requiring amendment of claims to include all features of claims 1, 4, and 5 of the UK application, and prohibiting assertion or filing of wider claims, regardless of jurisdiction or parties asserted against.
Court Disposition
Injunction granted in the form matching the undertaking, subject to drafting corrections.
Orders
- Claimant to take all steps within its power to amend all pending patent applications and granted patents deriving from or based on International Patent Application No. PCT/GB01/03965 published as WO02/022371 so all claims to a tape drive push-pull type tape transport mechanism for printers include all features of...
- Claimant restrained from filing any patent application deriving from or based on the International Application with claims to a tape drive push-pull type tape transport mechanism for printers not including all features of claims 1, 4, and 5 of the UK Application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment