Interflora Inc & Anor v Marks and Spencer Plc & Anor
Permission was granted because the evidence from the 13 witnesses, though not statistically representative, is evidence of actual confusion in the real world, has been obtained transparently, and is likely to be of some value in assisting the court to answer the relevant legal question. The value of the evidence justifies the costs involved given the scale of the litigation and sums at stake.
- Parties
- Claimant: Interflora, Inc.; Claimant: Interflora British Unit; Defendant: Marks and Spencer PLC; Defendant: Flowers Direct Online Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Adduce Evidence
- Outcome
- Permission granted to adduce evidence of 13 witnesses.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Evidence, Consumer Surveys, Likelihood of Confusion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Interflora, Inc.
Claimant
Interflora British Unit
Claimant
Marks and Spencer PLC
Defendant
Flowers Direct Online Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Adduce Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to adduce evidence from 13 witnesses identified via customer surveys
- 2 Whether such evidence is valuable and justifies the costs involved
Ratio Decidendi
Permission was granted because the evidence from the 13 witnesses, though not statistically representative, is evidence of actual confusion in the real world, has been obtained transparently, and is likely to be of some value in assisting the court to answer the relevant legal question. The value of the evidence justifies the costs involved given the scale of the litigation and sums at stake.
Court Disposition
Permission granted to adduce evidence of 13 witnesses.
Orders
- Interflora is permitted to adduce the evidence of the 13 witnesses at trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment