Samson v Ali [2012] EWHC 4146 (QB) (21 November 2012)
Mr. Simm's evidence, whether regarded as expert or factual, is relevant and potentially helpful to the court in assessing the surveillance evidence central to the case. Criticisms regarding qualification and bias go to weight, not admissibility. The application to admit the evidence is allowed.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 4146
- Parties
- Applicant: Marlene Samson; Respondent: Mohammed Ali
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Damages / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Rely on Evidence
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Expert Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Surveillance Evidence, Bias, Civil Evidence Act 1972, Human Rights Article 8
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marlene Samson
Applicant
Mohammed Ali
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Damages / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Rely on Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr. Simm's evidence should be admitted as expert or factual evidence
- 2 Whether Mr. Simm is qualified as an expert
- 3 Whether the evidence is relevant and helpful to the court
Ratio Decidendi
Mr. Simm's evidence, whether regarded as expert or factual, is relevant and potentially helpful to the court in assessing the surveillance evidence central to the case. Criticisms regarding qualification and bias go to weight, not admissibility. The application to admit the evidence is allowed.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Permission granted for claimant to rely on Mr. Simm's evidence at trial
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment