Cleary v Marston (Holdings) Ltd [2021] EWHC 3809 (QB) (25 November 2021)
The claim is straightforward, of low value, with limited factual and legal complexity, and does not require a specialist judge; therefore, it should be transferred to the County Court and allocated to the small claims track.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 3809 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Joseph Cleary; Defendant: Marston (Holdings) Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Data Protection / Privacy / Case Management Conference; Order for Transfer and Allocation
- Outcome
- Claim transferred to County Court and allocated to small claims track.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Data Protection Legislation, Misuse of Private Information, Breach of Confidence, Jurisdiction and Allocation, Small Claims Track, Remedies Declarations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Cleary
Claimant
Marston (Holdings) Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Data Protection / Privacy / Case Management Conference; Order for Transfer and Allocation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim should be heard in the High Court or County Court
- 2 Whether the claim should be allocated to the small claims track
- 3 Whether a declaration is an appropriate remedy in this type of claim
Ratio Decidendi
The claim is straightforward, of low value, with limited factual and legal complexity, and does not require a specialist judge; therefore, it should be transferred to the County Court and allocated to the small claims track.
Court Disposition
Claim transferred to County Court and allocated to small claims track.
Orders
- Proceedings transferred to Claimant's home county court (Manchester).
- Claim allocated to the small claims track.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment