Wendy Price v Marston's PLC

Wendy Price v Marston's PLC

The trial judge's finding on causation was upheld as it was supported by the evidence and expert testimony. The judge's assessment of life expectancy was set aside as it was inconsistent and not rationally explained; the reduction should be 8 years, not 9. The judge's approach to financial dependency was contrary to established principle and not justified; the conventional method should have been applied based on joint income at the date of death, but no loss was proved after age 73.

Parties
Claimant: Wendy Price; Defendant: Marston's PLC
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 July 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; trial judge's findings on causation upheld, life expectancy and financial dependency assessment varied.
Legal Topics
Causation, Quantum of Damages, Financial Dependency, Life Expectancy, Assessment of Damages
Tort Personal Injury Fatal Accidents Causation Quantum of Damages Financial Dependency Life Expectancy Assessment of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wendy Price

Claimant

Marston's PLC

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in finding causation between the fall and fatal infection
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge erred in the assessment of life expectancy
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge erred in the assessment of financial dependency

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge's finding on causation was upheld as it was supported by the evidence and expert testimony. The judge's assessment of life expectancy was set aside as it was inconsistent and not rationally explained; the reduction should be 8 years, not 9. The judge's approach to financial dependency was contrary to established principle and not justified; the conventional method should have been applied based on joint income at the date of death, but no loss was proved after age 73.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; trial judge's findings on causation upheld, life expectancy and financial dependency assessment varied.

Orders

  • Trial judge's finding on causation affirmed; Marston's appeal on causation dismissed.
  • Reduction in life expectancy set at 8 years, not 9; future loss multiplier adjusted accordingly.