Hydra Plc & Ors v Anastasi & Ors

Hydra Plc & Ors v Anastasi & Ors

Limited breaches of contract/duty by Mr Marsh found; restrictive covenants in compromise agreement and employment contract largely enforceable but not breached in material respects; no tortious, equitable or contractual liability established against Mr Anastasi or Tomax; no evidence of poaching, inducement, or dishonest assistance; losses not proven.

Parties
Claimant: Hydra PLC; Claimant: Hydra Liveware Limited; Claimant: Comms Liveware Limited; Claimant: Ecommbox Limited; Defendant: Martin Anastasi; Defendant: Keith Marsh; Defendant: Tomax Solutions
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 July 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed except for limited admitted breaches by Mr Marsh; further submissions required on damages and consequential orders.
Legal Topics
Restrictive Covenants, Fiduciary Duties, Breach of Contract, Restraint of Trade, Confidential Information, Inducement of Breach, Dishonest Assistance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 8 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 14
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hydra PLC

Claimant

Hydra Liveware Limited

Claimant

Comms Liveware Limited

Claimant

Ecommbox Limited

Claimant

Martin Anastasi

Defendant

Keith Marsh

Defendant

Tomax Solutions

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Enforceability of restrictive covenants in compromise agreement and employment contract
  2. 2 Breach of implied terms and fiduciary duties
  3. 3 Inducement/procurement of breach of contract

Ratio Decidendi

Limited breaches of contract/duty by Mr Marsh found; restrictive covenants in compromise agreement and employment contract largely enforceable but not breached in material respects; no tortious, equitable or contractual liability established against Mr Anastasi or Tomax; no evidence of poaching, inducement, or dishonest assistance; losses not proven.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed except for limited admitted breaches by Mr Marsh; further submissions required on damages and consequential orders.