Pace & Anor v R.
Proof of a mental element of suspicion alone does not suffice for a conviction of attempted money laundering under s.1 of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 and s.327 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. The accused must intend to commit all elements of the offence, including that the property is criminal property. The trial judge erred in directing the jury that suspicion sufficed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Martin Edward Pace; Appellant: Simon Peter Rogers; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; convictions quashed
- Legal Topics
- Attempt, Money Laundering, Mens Rea, Impossibility, Conspiracy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Edward Pace
Appellant
Simon Peter Rogers
Appellant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the required mental element (mens rea) for the offence of attempting to conceal, disguise or convert criminal property under s.1 Criminal Attempts Act 1981 and s.327 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002?
- 2 Does suspicion suffice as the mental element for attempted money laundering, or is intent/knowledge required?
Ratio Decidendi
Proof of a mental element of suspicion alone does not suffice for a conviction of attempted money laundering under s.1 of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 and s.327 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. The accused must intend to commit all elements of the offence, including that the property is criminal property. The trial judge erred in directing the jury that suspicion sufficed.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; convictions quashed
Orders
- Convictions of Martin Edward Pace and Simon Peter Rogers for attempted money laundering are quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment