Francis v Francis
Permission to appeal is granted on the ground that the High Court judge may have erred in refusing to rehear evidence on updated property valuations, potentially resulting in an outcome contrary to the intention of the original order. Permission is refused on other grounds, including the treatment of pre-marital assets and the pre-nuptial contract.
- Parties
- Applicant: Martin Francis; Respondent: Dagmar Ursula Helene Francis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Ancillary Relief / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Appeals, Division of Assets, Pre Nuptial Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Francis
Applicant
Dagmar Ursula Helene Francis
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Ancillary Relief / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court judge erred in refusing to rehear evidence on updated property valuations in ancillary relief proceedings
- 2 Whether the principles in Barder v Caluori apply to timely appeals in ancillary relief
- 3 Whether the district judge's allowance for pre-marital assets was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted on the ground that the High Court judge may have erred in refusing to rehear evidence on updated property valuations, potentially resulting in an outcome contrary to the intention of the original order. Permission is refused on other grounds, including the treatment of pre-marital assets and the pre-nuptial contract.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted on ground 3 (treatment of updated property valuations)
- Permission to appeal refused on other grounds
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment