Hague Plant Ltd v Hague & Ors

Hague Plant Ltd v Hague & Ors

The application to re-amend the particulars of claim is refused because the proposed amendments are disproportionate, prolix, and would cause further delay and expense. The majority of amendments amplify and introduce new causes of action, fundamentally change the case, and are not justified at this late stage. Reinstatement of the de facto director claim against Jean Angela Hague is not warranted, and new claims lack sufficient explanation or justification. Only amendments expressly consented to by the defendants are permitted.

Parties
Claimant: Hague Plant Limited; Defendant: Martin Hartley Hague; Defendant: Jean Angela Hague; Defendant: MHH Contracting Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 March 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Re Amend Particulars of Claim
Outcome
Application to re-amend particulars of claim refused except for amendments expressly consented to by defendants.
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Fiduciary Duties, De Facto Directors, Dishonest Assistance, Limitation of Actions, Proportionality in Litigation
Civil Procedure Company Law Amendment of Pleadings Fiduciary Duties De Facto Directors Dishonest Assistance Limitation of Actions Proportionality in Litigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hague Plant Limited

Claimant

Martin Hartley Hague

Defendant

Jean Angela Hague

Defendant

MHH Contracting Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application to Re Amend Particulars of Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant should be permitted to re-amend the particulars of claim
  2. 2 Whether allegations against Jean Angela Hague as de facto director can be reinstated
  3. 3 Whether new claims regarding recycling business and work done by HPL on MHH sites can be introduced

Ratio Decidendi

The application to re-amend the particulars of claim is refused because the proposed amendments are disproportionate, prolix, and would cause further delay and expense. The majority of amendments amplify and introduce new causes of action, fundamentally change the case, and are not justified at this late stage. Reinstatement of the de facto director claim against Jean Angela Hague is not warranted, and new claims lack sufficient explanation or justification. Only amendments expressly consented to by the defendants are permitted.

Court Disposition

Application to re-amend particulars of claim refused except for amendments expressly consented to by defendants.

Orders

  • Application to re-amend particulars of claim dismissed except for amendments with express written consent.
  • Very late application to amend the Claim Form dismissed.