Martin Horsler v The Commissioners for HMRC
The Tribunal found that the information notice was valid, the appellant did not comply with the notice, and the requested documents were within his possession or power. The appellant failed to provide credible evidence that the documents were unobtainable and did not make serious attempts to acquire them. No...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Martin Horsler; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Judgment After Remote Video Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; penalties upheld
- Legal Topics
- Information Notice Compliance, Schedule 36 Finance Act 2008, Reasonable Excuse, Possession or Power of Documents, Tax Penalties
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Horsler
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Judgment After Remote Video Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the information notice under Schedule 36 Finance Act 2008 was valid
- 2 Whether the appellant complied with the information notice
- 3 Whether the requested documents were within the appellant’s possession or power
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the information notice was valid, the appellant did not comply with the notice, and the requested documents were within his possession or power. The appellant failed to provide credible evidence that the documents were unobtainable and did not make serious attempts to acquire them. No reasonable excuse was established for non-compliance. Penalties were therefore upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; penalties upheld
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed
- The penalties imposed by HMRC are upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment