Martin John Brown & Anor v Paul Bernard Fleuriot & Anor
The Applicants and their predecessors were in adverse possession of the Shed from the 1980s, extinguishing the paper title owner's rights before first registration in 2014. The registration of the Shed as part of Number 4 was a mistake. The Applicants' interest was an overriding interest binding the Respondents. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Martin John Brown; Applicant: Gillian Brown; Respondent: Paul Bernard Fleuriot; Respondent: Elaine Rose-Fleuriot
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Land Registration Reference / Post Hearing Decision With Directions for Final Order
- Outcome
- Application allowed (subject to representations on the proposed order)
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Alteration of Register, First Registration, Mistaken Registration, Overriding Interests
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin John Brown
Applicant
Gillian Brown
Applicant
Paul Bernard Fleuriot
Respondent
Elaine Rose-Fleuriot
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Registration Reference / Post Hearing Decision With Directions for Final Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicants have acquired title to the Shed by adverse possession
- 2 Whether the application is valid under Schedule 6 or Schedule 12 of the Land Registration Act 2002
- 3 Whether the register should be altered to correct a mistaken first registration under Schedule 4
Ratio Decidendi
The Applicants and their predecessors were in adverse possession of the Shed from the 1980s, extinguishing the paper title owner's rights before first registration in 2014. The registration of the Shed as part of Number 4 was a mistake. The Applicants' interest was an overriding interest binding the Respondents. The register should be altered to remove the Shed from Number 4 and register the Applicants as proprietors with absolute title. There are no exceptional circumstances justifying refusal of alteration.
Court Disposition
Application allowed (subject to representations on the proposed order)
Orders
- Parties given 28 days to make written representations on the proposed order to alter the register and register the Applicants as proprietors of the Shed with absolute title.
- If no objections, Chief Land Registrar to remove the Shed from Number 4 and register the Applicants as first proprietors with absolute title.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment