Cowan v Foreman & Ors
The claimant failed to demonstrate good reasons for the substantial delay in making her claim and did not have an arguable case that the will failed to make reasonable financial provision for her; therefore, permission to apply out of time was refused.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mary Jane Cowan; Defendant: Martin John Foreman; Defendant: Farrer & Co Trust Company; Defendant: Timothy Cowan; Defendant: Marina Cowan; Defendant: Amanda Cowan; Defendant: Gerald Musial; Defendant: Robert Musial; Defendant: James Anthony Trafford and James Anthony John Beazley; Defendant: Bryony Louise Andree Cove
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Section 4 of the Inheritance (provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 / Judgment on Application for Permission to Apply Out of Time
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Reasonable Financial Provision, Discretionary Trusts, Inheritance Tax, Summary Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Jane Cowan
Claimant
Martin John Foreman
Defendant
Farrer & Co Trust Company
Defendant
Timothy Cowan
Defendant
Marina Cowan
Defendant
Amanda Cowan
Defendant
Gerald Musial
Defendant
Robert Musial
Defendant
James Anthony Trafford and James Anthony John Beazley
Defendant
Bryony Louise Andree Cove
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 4 of the Inheritance (provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 / Judgment on Application for Permission to Apply Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant should be granted permission to apply for substantive relief under section 2 of the 1975 Act out of time
- 2 Whether the will failed to make reasonable financial provision for the claimant
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to demonstrate good reasons for the substantial delay in making her claim and did not have an arguable case that the will failed to make reasonable financial provision for her; therefore, permission to apply out of time was refused.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Permission to apply under section 2 of the 1975 Act out of time is refused.
- Application for permission to appeal is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment