Powell v Turner

Powell v Turner

Permission to appeal was refused because the alleged errors of law would not affect the outcome, the Claimant's belief in ownership was honestly and reasonably held, the Defendant's arguments merely repeated points already rejected, and there was no compelling reason for appeal given the fact-sensitive nature of band name cases and lack of industry demand for clarity.

Parties
Claimant: Andrew Powell; Defendant: Martin Robert Turner
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 October 2013
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property Dispute / Application for Permission to Appeal After Judgment
Outcome
Permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Trademark Validity, Bad Faith, Ownership of Goodwill, Band Names, Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Powell

Claimant

Martin Robert Turner

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Intellectual Property Dispute / Application for Permission to Appeal After Judgment

  1. 1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted on the issue of validity, specifically bad faith
  2. 2 Whether actual legal ownership of goodwill should have been considered in the bad faith analysis
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant's belief in sole ownership was honestly and reasonably held

Ratio Decidendi

Permission to appeal was refused because the alleged errors of law would not affect the outcome, the Claimant's belief in ownership was honestly and reasonably held, the Defendant's arguments merely repeated points already rejected, and there was no compelling reason for appeal given the fact-sensitive nature of band name cases and lack of industry demand for clarity.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal refused