Powell v Turner
Permission to appeal was refused because the alleged errors of law would not affect the outcome, the Claimant's belief in ownership was honestly and reasonably held, the Defendant's arguments merely repeated points already rejected, and there was no compelling reason for appeal given the fact-sensitive nature of band name cases and lack of industry demand for clarity.
- Parties
- Claimant: Andrew Powell; Defendant: Martin Robert Turner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property Dispute / Application for Permission to Appeal After Judgment
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Trademark Validity, Bad Faith, Ownership of Goodwill, Band Names, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Powell
Claimant
Martin Robert Turner
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property Dispute / Application for Permission to Appeal After Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted on the issue of validity, specifically bad faith
- 2 Whether actual legal ownership of goodwill should have been considered in the bad faith analysis
- 3 Whether the Claimant's belief in sole ownership was honestly and reasonably held
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal was refused because the alleged errors of law would not affect the outcome, the Claimant's belief in ownership was honestly and reasonably held, the Defendant's arguments merely repeated points already rejected, and there was no compelling reason for appeal given the fact-sensitive nature of band name cases and lack of industry demand for clarity.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment