Martin Rosenbaum v The Information Commissioner & Anor

Martin Rosenbaum v The Information Commissioner & Anor

The Tribunal held that while most of the requested material was exempt from disclosure under sections 37(1)(b), 41(1), and 40(2) FOIA, the public interest balance favoured disclosure of the Prime Minister's citations for Ross Kempsell and Charlotte Owen, and the names of those who supported Owen's citation (but not the content of their support). The Tribunal found that disclosure of these specific citations would enhance transparency and public confidence in the appointments process without undermining HOLAC's effectiveness or breaching confidentiality or data protection principles. The remainder of the material was lawfully withheld.

Parties
Appellant: Martin Rosenbaum; 1st Respondent: The Information Commissioner; 2nd Respondent: House of Lords Appointments Commission
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 December 2024
Procedural Posture
FOIA Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber) Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in part
Legal Topics
Freedom of Information Act 2000, Public Interest Test, Confidentiality, Personal Data, Parliamentary Appointments
Information Law Constitutional Law Data Protection Freedom of Information Act 2000 Public Interest Test Confidentiality Personal Data Parliamentary Appointments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Martin Rosenbaum

Appellant

The Information Commissioner

1st Respondent

House of Lords Appointments Commission

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

FOIA Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber) Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the exemptions under sections 37(1)(b), 41(1), and 40(2) FOIA apply to the requested information
  2. 2 Whether the public interest balance favours disclosure or non-disclosure of the citations and related material
  3. 3 Whether disclosure would constitute an actionable breach of confidence or unlawful processing of personal data

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that while most of the requested material was exempt from disclosure under sections 37(1)(b), 41(1), and 40(2) FOIA, the public interest balance favoured disclosure of the Prime Minister's citations for Ross Kempsell and Charlotte Owen, and the names of those who supported Owen's citation (but not the content of their support). The Tribunal found that disclosure of these specific citations would enhance transparency and public confidence in the appointments process without undermining HOLAC's effectiveness or breaching confidentiality or data protection principles. The remainder of the material was lawfully withheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in part

Orders

  • Within 35 days, the House of Lords Appointments Commission shall disclose the citations relating to The Rt Hon the Baron Kempsell of Letchworth (A26CB–A27CB) and The Rt Hon the Baroness Owen of Alderley Edge (A31CB), including the names of those who supported Owen's citation but not the content of their support.