Walsh, R. v
There was sufficient evidence of dangerousness and aggravating features to justify a life sentence, but the minimum term imposed was manifestly excessive given the appellant's age, lack of previous custodial sentence, and the circumstances of the offences. The appropriate notional determinate sentence should have been in the region of 13 years before credit for the guilty plea, resulting in a minimum term of four-and-a-half years' detention, less time spent on remand.
- Parties
- Appellant: Martin Samuel Walsh; Respondent: Regina (The Crown)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sentencing, Life Imprisonment, Minimum Term, Dangerous Offenders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Samuel Walsh
Appellant
Regina (The Crown)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the imposition of a life sentence was appropriate for the offences committed
- 2 Whether the minimum term imposed was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
There was sufficient evidence of dangerousness and aggravating features to justify a life sentence, but the minimum term imposed was manifestly excessive given the appellant's age, lack of previous custodial sentence, and the circumstances of the offences. The appropriate notional determinate sentence should have been in the region of 13 years before credit for the guilty plea, resulting in a minimum term of four-and-a-half years' detention, less time spent on remand.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Life sentence upheld
- Minimum term reduced to four-and-a-half years' detention, less days spent in custody on remand
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment