Walsh, R. v

Walsh, R. v

There was sufficient evidence of dangerousness and aggravating features to justify a life sentence, but the minimum term imposed was manifestly excessive given the appellant's age, lack of previous custodial sentence, and the circumstances of the offences. The appropriate notional determinate sentence should have been in the region of 13 years before credit for the guilty plea, resulting in a minimum term of four-and-a-half years' detention, less time spent on remand.

Parties
Appellant: Martin Samuel Walsh; Respondent: Regina (The Crown)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 May 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Rape, Sentencing, Life Imprisonment, Minimum Term, Dangerous Offenders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Martin Samuel Walsh

Appellant

Regina (The Crown)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the imposition of a life sentence was appropriate for the offences committed
  2. 2 Whether the minimum term imposed was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

There was sufficient evidence of dangerousness and aggravating features to justify a life sentence, but the minimum term imposed was manifestly excessive given the appellant's age, lack of previous custodial sentence, and the circumstances of the offences. The appropriate notional determinate sentence should have been in the region of 13 years before credit for the guilty plea, resulting in a minimum term of four-and-a-half years' detention, less time spent on remand.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Life sentence upheld
  • Minimum term reduced to four-and-a-half years' detention, less days spent in custody on remand