Martin White v Sarah Brindley
The FTT acted outside its discretion and unfairly by deciding the insurance charge issue, which was not raised or pursued by the respondent, thereby descending into the arena and acting as an advocate for the tenant. The FTT's decision on insurance premiums is set aside and replaced with a finding that they are payable in full.
- Parties
- Appellant: Martin White; Respondent: Sarah Brindley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Landlord and Tenant Service Charges / Appeal From First Tier Tribunal to Upper Tribunal (lands Chamber)
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Service Charges, Lease Interpretation, Tribunal Procedure, Fairness in Adjudication
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin White
Appellant
Sarah Brindley
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Landlord and Tenant Service Charges / Appeal From First Tier Tribunal to Upper Tribunal (lands Chamber)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal acted unfairly by deciding an issue not raised by the parties
- 2 Whether the respondent is liable under the lease to pay insurance charges as part of the service charge
Ratio Decidendi
The FTT acted outside its discretion and unfairly by deciding the insurance charge issue, which was not raised or pursued by the respondent, thereby descending into the arena and acting as an advocate for the tenant. The FTT's decision on insurance premiums is set aside and replaced with a finding that they are payable in full.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The FTT's decision on insurance premiums is set aside and replaced with a finding that they are payable in full.
- The respondent is to pay the applicant the whole of the £114 application fee within 28 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment