Joyce v Joyce [2013] EWHC 1353 (Fam) (16 May 2013)
The court found beyond reasonable doubt that the father knows the whereabouts of the children or how they can be contacted, and is in contempt for failing to provide this information and comply with the return order.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 1353 (Fam)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mary Joyce; Respondent: Patrick Joyce
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Hague Convention Child Abduction / Contempt Proceedings Following Non Compliance With Return Order
- Outcome
- Respondent found in contempt of court and sentenced to six months' imprisonment, with opportunity to purge contempt by assisting the court.
- Legal Topics
- Hague Convention, Child Return Orders, Contempt of Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Joyce
Applicant
Patrick Joyce
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Hague Convention Child Abduction / Contempt Proceedings Following Non Compliance With Return Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent is in contempt of court for failing to comply with orders to return children to Ireland under the Hague Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The court found beyond reasonable doubt that the father knows the whereabouts of the children or how they can be contacted, and is in contempt for failing to provide this information and comply with the return order.
Court Disposition
Respondent found in contempt of court and sentenced to six months' imprisonment, with opportunity to purge contempt by assisting the court.
Orders
- Respondent committed to prison for six months for contempt of court.
- Respondent may return to court to purge contempt by assisting in locating the children.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment