MAS v ZK & Ors
The court holds that, in cases involving children at risk of forced marriage abroad, the local authority is usually the primary body to investigate and facilitate repatriation, with the FCDO/FMU providing facilitative support and country-specific advice. The FCDO is not obliged to lead or conduct investigations or repatriations except in truly exceptional circumstances at the Foreign Secretary’s discretion. The roles of all agencies must be determined on a case-by-case basis, with early multi-agency engagement and judicial directions as needed.
- Parties
- Applicant: MAS; Respondent: ZK; Respondent: A A S; Respondent: London Borough of Brent
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Judicial Observations Following Conclusion of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Judicial observations and guidance issued; no new orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Forced Marriage, Wardship, Repatriation of Children, Jurisdiction, Multi Agency Safeguarding, Consular Assistance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MAS
Applicant
ZK
Respondent
A A S
Respondent
London Borough of Brent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family / Judicial Observations Following Conclusion of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Which UK authority should investigate facts and repatriate a child at risk of forced marriage abroad
- 2 Role and limits of FCDO, FMU, local authorities, and police in forced marriage cases involving children overseas
- 3 Appropriate procedural framework for multi-agency cooperation in such cases
Ratio Decidendi
The court holds that, in cases involving children at risk of forced marriage abroad, the local authority is usually the primary body to investigate and facilitate repatriation, with the FCDO/FMU providing facilitative support and country-specific advice. The FCDO is not obliged to lead or conduct investigations or repatriations except in truly exceptional circumstances at the Foreign Secretary’s discretion. The roles of all agencies must be determined on a case-by-case basis, with early multi-agency engagement and judicial directions as needed.
Court Disposition
Judicial observations and guidance issued; no new orders made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment