Mashate v Kaguta

Mashate v Kaguta

Given the appellant's conduct, including flouting court procedures, lack of good faith, failure to comply with costs orders, and the inherent weakness and limitation issues in the claim, the order requiring payment of costs as a precondition to lifting the stay was justified and not an improper fetter on the right to litigate.

Parties
Appellant: Mashate; Respondent: Kaguta
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 March 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Security for Costs, Abuse of Process, Limitation of Actions, State Immunity
Civil Procedure Contract Law Security for Costs Abuse of Process Limitation of Actions State Immunity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mashate

Appellant

Kaguta

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the precondition to a stay application imposed by HHJ Yelton was wrong
  2. 2 Whether the order for payment of costs as a precondition to lifting the stay improperly fettered the appellant's right to litigate
  3. 3 Whether the order was an abuse of process or disproportionate

Ratio Decidendi

Given the appellant's conduct, including flouting court procedures, lack of good faith, failure to comply with costs orders, and the inherent weakness and limitation issues in the claim, the order requiring payment of costs as a precondition to lifting the stay was justified and not an improper fetter on the right to litigate.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Order of HHJ Yelton upheld requiring payment of £50,000 as a precondition to any application to lift the stay
  • No further application to lift the stay unless and until the order for costs is complied with