Iqbal v Dean Manson Solicitors
The three letters, viewed together, are arguably capable of amounting to a course of conduct constituting harassment under the Act. The procedural error in commencing under Part 7 rather than Part 8 does not invalidate the claim. A partnership can be a defendant to a civil claim under the Act. The defence may be...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mashood Iqbal; Respondent: Dean Manson Solicitors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Second Appeal; Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Harassment, Protection From Harassment Act, Civil Procedure, Partnership Liability
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mashood Iqbal
Appellant
Dean Manson Solicitors
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal; Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a series of letters sent by the respondent to the appellant and the court were capable of amounting to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997
- 2 Whether a partnership can be a defendant to a civil claim under the Act
- 3 Whether the defence and post-claim conduct can be considered as part of a course of conduct for harassment
Ratio Decidendi
The three letters, viewed together, are arguably capable of amounting to a course of conduct constituting harassment under the Act. The procedural error in commencing under Part 7 rather than Part 8 does not invalidate the claim. A partnership can be a defendant to a civil claim under the Act. The defence may be considered evidentially in assessing the course of conduct.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Appeal allowed; claim reinstated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment