Masih, R (on the application of) v Yousaf
The section 8 notice, though not verbatim, sufficiently conveyed the substance of ground 8 and was not defective. The lower courts correctly held they had no jurisdiction to set aside the possession order made in the presence of both parties. The judge's decision to require a formal application for permission to appeal was a case management decision not open to challenge. The appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Masih; Respondent: Yousaf
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assured Shorthold Tenancy, Possession Proceedings, Section 8 Notice, Mandatory Grounds, Form of Notice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Masih
Applicant
Yousaf
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the section 8 notice served under the Housing Act 1988 was defective for failing to include the words 'rent lawfully due'
- 2 Whether the lower courts had jurisdiction to set aside the possession order
- 3 Whether the appellant should have been granted permission to appeal out of time
Ratio Decidendi
The section 8 notice, though not verbatim, sufficiently conveyed the substance of ground 8 and was not defective. The lower courts correctly held they had no jurisdiction to set aside the possession order made in the presence of both parties. The judge's decision to require a formal application for permission to appeal was a case management decision not open to challenge. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment