Masih, R (on the application of) v Yousaf

Masih, R (on the application of) v Yousaf

The section 8 notice, though not verbatim, sufficiently conveyed the substance of ground 8 and was not defective. The lower courts correctly held they had no jurisdiction to set aside the possession order made in the presence of both parties. The judge's decision to require a formal application for permission to appeal was a case management decision not open to challenge. The appeal is dismissed.

Parties
Applicant: Masih; Respondent: Yousaf
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 February 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Assured Shorthold Tenancy, Possession Proceedings, Section 8 Notice, Mandatory Grounds, Form of Notice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Masih

Applicant

Yousaf

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the section 8 notice served under the Housing Act 1988 was defective for failing to include the words 'rent lawfully due'
  2. 2 Whether the lower courts had jurisdiction to set aside the possession order
  3. 3 Whether the appellant should have been granted permission to appeal out of time

Ratio Decidendi

The section 8 notice, though not verbatim, sufficiently conveyed the substance of ground 8 and was not defective. The lower courts correctly held they had no jurisdiction to set aside the possession order made in the presence of both parties. The judge's decision to require a formal application for permission to appeal was a case management decision not open to challenge. The appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.