Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Mastercard Incorporated & Ors [2013] EWHC 4554 (Ch) (19 December 2013)
The application for a preliminary issue on ex turpi causa is refused because it would not necessarily dispose of the claim, would not save significant costs or time, and would likely require substantial factual and legal inquiry. The disclosure application is granted in the terms of the defendants' draft, limiting disclosure to relevant documents from May 2006 onward and deferring disclosure of documents created for regulatory investigations pending input from the authorities.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 4554 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited; Defendant: MasterCard Incorporated; Defendant: MasterCard International Incorporated; Defendant: MasterCard Europe S. P. R. L.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Damages Claim / Case Management Conference (cmc) With Applications for Preliminary Issue and Disclosure
- Outcome
- Defendants' application for trial of a preliminary issue refused; claimant's disclosure application granted in part as per defendants' draft order.
- Legal Topics
- Interchange Fees, Article 101 TFEU, Chapter I Competition Act 1998, Disclosure, Preliminary Issues, Ex Turpi Causa, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited
Claimant
MasterCard Incorporated
Defendant
MasterCard International Incorporated
Defendant
MasterCard Europe S. P. R. L.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Competition Damages Claim / Case Management Conference (cmc) With Applications for Preliminary Issue and Disclosure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim is barred by ex turpi causa due to claimant's participation in the alleged infringement
- 2 Whether to order trial of a preliminary issue on ex turpi causa
- 3 Scope and procedure for disclosure of documents
Ratio Decidendi
The application for a preliminary issue on ex turpi causa is refused because it would not necessarily dispose of the claim, would not save significant costs or time, and would likely require substantial factual and legal inquiry. The disclosure application is granted in the terms of the defendants' draft, limiting disclosure to relevant documents from May 2006 onward and deferring disclosure of documents created for regulatory investigations pending input from the authorities.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application for trial of a preliminary issue refused; claimant's disclosure application granted in part as per defendants' draft order.
Orders
- No order for trial of preliminary issue on ex turpi causa.
- Standard disclosure on liability (including exemption) by defendants by 11 April 2014, limited to relevant documents from 23 May 2006 onward.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment