Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc & Ors v Mastercard Inc & Ors
The proposed amendment pleads a new cause of action (concerted practice) which is factually and legally distinct from the original pleaded breach (decision by association of undertakings) and does not arise out of the same or substantially the same facts; therefore, the amendment cannot relate back to the date of the original claim for limitation purposes and is only permitted for the period within six years prior to the application date.
- Parties
- Claimants: WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and others; Defendant: MasterCard Incorporated; Defendant: MasterCard International Incorporated; Defendant: MasterCard Europe SPRL; Defendant: MasterCard UK Members Forum Limited (in members voluntary liquidation); Defendant: MasterCard/Europay UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim for Breach of Competition Law/statutory Duty / Application for Leave to Amend Particulars of Claim
- Outcome
- Application for leave to amend granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Amendment of Pleadings, Breach of Statutory Duty, Concerted Practices, Association of Undertakings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and others
Claimants
MasterCard Incorporated
Defendant
MasterCard International Incorporated
Defendant
MasterCard Europe SPRL
Defendant
MasterCard UK Members Forum Limited (in members voluntary liquidation)
Defendant
MasterCard/Europay UK Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim for Breach of Competition Law/statutory Duty / Application for Leave to Amend Particulars of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed amendment to plead a new cause of action (concerted practice) can relate back to the date of the original claim under s.35(1) Limitation Act 1980
- 2 Whether the new cause of action arises out of the same facts or substantially the same facts as the original claim
- 3 Whether the limitation period bars the new claim for periods prior to six years before the application
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed amendment pleads a new cause of action (concerted practice) which is factually and legally distinct from the original pleaded breach (decision by association of undertakings) and does not arise out of the same or substantially the same facts; therefore, the amendment cannot relate back to the date of the original claim for limitation purposes and is only permitted for the period within six years prior to the application date.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to amend granted in part
Orders
- Leave to amend Particulars of Claim to plead the new cause of action limited to the period within six years prior to 8 October 2013; no relation back to the start of the limitation period of the pre-existing claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment