Detamu v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 604 (24 February 2006)
The adjudicator's error of law in rejecting Dr Trueman's expert report was material, as it went to the core of the appellant's claim regarding OLF membership and risk on return; proper consideration of the report could have affected the credibility assessment and outcome.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 604
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Detamu; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Immigration Appeal / Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Materiality of Error of Law, Assessment of Expert Evidence, Credibility in Asylum Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Detamu
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator's error of law in rejecting expert evidence was material to the outcome
- 2 Appropriate approach to admitted errors of law in adjudication
- 3 Assessment of credibility in asylum claims
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator's error of law in rejecting Dr Trueman's expert report was material, as it went to the core of the appellant's claim regarding OLF membership and risk on return; proper consideration of the report could have affected the credibility assessment and outcome.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- matter remitted to the tribunal for reconsideration
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment