Carter v Ahsan [2005] EWCA Civ 990 (28 July 2005)

Carter v Ahsan [2005] EWCA Civ 990 (28 July 2005)

The employment tribunal had constitutive jurisdiction to hear Mr Ahsan's claims as asserted under s.12 of the Race Relations Act 1976. The subsequent decision in Ali v McDonagh did not retrospectively deprive the tribunal of jurisdiction or render its proceedings a nullity; any error was within adjudicative jurisdiction and subject to appeal, not collateral challenge. The tribunal's finding of direct race discrimination was justified on the facts, and the comparator used was appropriate.

Citation
[2005] EWCA Civ 990
Parties
Appellant: Matt Carter; Respondent: Raghib Ahsan
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 July 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeals dismissed; cross-appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Race Discrimination, Jurisdiction of Employment Tribunals, Issue Estoppel, Finality of Judgments, Comparators in Discrimination Cases

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Matt Carter

Appellant

Raghib Ahsan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the employment tribunal had jurisdiction to hear race discrimination claims against the Labour Party under s.12 of the Race Relations Act 1976 after the Court of Appeal's decision in Ali v McDonagh
  2. 2 Whether the tribunal erred in finding direct race discrimination against Mr Ahsan

Ratio Decidendi

The employment tribunal had constitutive jurisdiction to hear Mr Ahsan's claims as asserted under s.12 of the Race Relations Act 1976. The subsequent decision in Ali v McDonagh did not retrospectively deprive the tribunal of jurisdiction or render its proceedings a nullity; any error was within adjudicative jurisdiction and subject to appeal, not collateral challenge. The tribunal's finding of direct race discrimination was justified on the facts, and the comparator used was appropriate.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed; cross-appeal allowed

Orders

  • The appeals by the Labour Party are dismissed.
  • The cross-appeal by Mr Ahsan is allowed.