Ashby, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 635 (24 April 2026)
The overall sentence reflected the protracted and varied criminality, with proper adjustments for personal mitigation and totality, and was within the relevant guidelines; the appeal was dismissed as the sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
- Citation
- [2026] EWCA Crim 635
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Matthew Ashby
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Appeal, Drug Offences, Driving Offences, Domestic Violence, Totality Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Matthew Ashby
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether sufficient reduction was made for personal mitigation and progress on remand
- 3 Whether the starting point for the lead drug offence was too high
Ratio Decidendi
The overall sentence reflected the protracted and varied criminality, with proper adjustments for personal mitigation and totality, and was within the relevant guidelines; the appeal was dismissed as the sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against sentence dismissed
- Disqualification from driving for six years and six months
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment