Reveal Media Ltd v Matthew Dawes
The adjournment to a one-hour hearing the following afternoon strikes the appropriate balance between urgency and procedural fairness.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Reveal Media Ltd; Defendant: Matthew Dawes
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction Application / Adjournment for Urgent Hearing
- Outcome
- Application adjourned for urgent hearing
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment, Injunctions, Urgent Applications
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Reveal Media Ltd
Claimant
Matthew Dawes
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Adjournment for Urgent Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to adjourn the injunction application to allow procedural fairness and effective use of court time
Ratio Decidendi
The adjournment to a one-hour hearing the following afternoon strikes the appropriate balance between urgency and procedural fairness.
Court Disposition
Application adjourned for urgent hearing
Orders
- The injunction application is adjourned to a one-hour hearing at 2pm the following afternoon.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EWHC 285 (KB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE KING'S BENCH DIVISION COURT 37 FORDHAM J (IN PUBLIC) KB-2024-000355 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Monday, 12 February 2024 Before: FORDHAM J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: REVEAL MEDIA LTD - and - MATTHEW DAWES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jamie Susskind (instructed by Michelmores LLP) for the Claimant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hearing date: 12.2.24 Claimant Defendant Judgment as delivered in open court at the hearing - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment I direct that no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FORDHAM J Note: This judgment was produced and approved by the Judge, after using voice-recognition software during an ex tempore judgment. FORDHAM J Approved Judgment FORDHAM J: Reveal Media Ltd v Dawes 1. 2. 3. I am adjourning this injunction application, to a one-hour hearing tomorrow afternoon. I can entirely understand why the Claimant’s solicitors have chosen to come to Court 37 today to secure an urgent one-hour hearing. But, in the event, I have been able to arrange for this case the alternative of a one-hour hearing here in Court 37 at 2pm tomorrow afternoon. This will afford an opportunity for the Defendant and his solicitors – who are aware of this urgent application and my intentions – to file any written submissions, and to attend the hearing and make any oral submissions to assist the Court, if they wish to do so. This promotes an informed Court, procedural fairness, and – since I will be able to pre-read some documents – the most effective use of Court time. Having announced this course of action, I have now had communicated from the Defendant’s solicitors a response which effectively reserves their position as to whether this course will allow a sufficient opportunity for a fully-briefed Counsel and a full response. I am entirely satisfied that the course I have taken strikes the appropriate balance so far as next steps are concerned. I will consider any further representations, as to any matter of substance or procedure, when they are received. But this case will be listed for 2pm tomorrow afternoon. 12.2.24 2