R v Matthew Farmer

R v Matthew Farmer

The sentencing judge correctly categorised the offences, applied the appropriate starting points and reductions, and imposed consecutive sentences. The total sentence of eight years was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness and circumstances of the offences.

Parties
Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Matthew Farmer
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 January 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Wounding With Intent, Possession of Bladed Article, Appeal Against Sentence, Totality Principle
Criminal Law Sentencing Wounding With Intent Possession of Bladed Article Appeal Against Sentence Totality Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Respondent

Matthew Farmer

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in categorising the wounding offence as high culpability and placing the sentence at the top of the range
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge mis-categorised the bladed article offence
  3. 3 Whether sufficient credit was given for the guilty plea

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge correctly categorised the offences, applied the appropriate starting points and reductions, and imposed consecutive sentences. The total sentence of eight years was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness and circumstances of the offences.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Sentence of eight years' imprisonment upheld