Dobson v Griffey

Dobson v Griffey

There was no express or inferred agreement between the parties for the claimant to have a share in the property or profits; the claimant’s contributions were not made in reliance on any promise or assurance by the defendant but as part of their relationship. The claimant did not prove entitlement to a beneficial interest under constructive trust or proprietary estoppel.

Parties
Claimant: Jacqueline Lisa Dobson; Defendant: Matthew John Fernall Griffey
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 May 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Constructive Trust, Proprietary Estoppel, Cohabitation, Beneficial Interest, Detrimental Reliance
Property Law Equity Constructive Trust Proprietary Estoppel Cohabitation Beneficial Interest Detrimental Reliance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jacqueline Lisa Dobson

Claimant

Matthew John Fernall Griffey

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to a share in the proceeds of sale of Ballhill Farm under constructive trust or proprietary estoppel
  2. 2 Whether there was a common intention or agreement between the parties regarding beneficial ownership
  3. 3 Whether the claimant acted to her detriment in reliance on any such agreement or assurance

Ratio Decidendi

There was no express or inferred agreement between the parties for the claimant to have a share in the property or profits; the claimant’s contributions were not made in reliance on any promise or assurance by the defendant but as part of their relationship. The claimant did not prove entitlement to a beneficial interest under constructive trust or proprietary estoppel.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed