R v Matthew Linfield
The appropriate sentence for the offences against C1, committed when the appellant was under 18, should reflect the likely sentence if imposed at the time, considering relevant guidelines and statutory maxima. The original sentence of 18 months was excessive; a sentence of four months for count 5 and three months for count 6, concurrent but consecutive to the sentence for C2, is just and proportionate.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Matthew Linfield
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Sentence Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Youth Offenders, Appeal Against Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Matthew Linfield
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Sentence Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for offences committed by an offender as a child, when sentenced as an adult?
- 2 Should the sentences for offences against C1 be reduced to reflect the appellant's age at the time of offending and relevant guidelines?
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate sentence for the offences against C1, committed when the appellant was under 18, should reflect the likely sentence if imposed at the time, considering relevant guidelines and statutory maxima. The original sentence of 18 months was excessive; a sentence of four months for count 5 and three months for count 6, concurrent but consecutive to the sentence for C2, is just and proportionate.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentence of 18 months on counts 5 and 6 quashed.
- Substitute sentence of four months' imprisonment on count 5 and three months' imprisonment on count 6, concurrent to each other but consecutive to sentence for C2.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment