Taylor v Manchester City Council TCG Bars Ltd [2012] EWHC 3467 (Admin) (07 December 2012)
The Licensing Act 2003 and associated regulations do not permit formal amendment of an application to vary a premises licence after submission and advertisement. However, the licensing authority may, in exercising its administrative discretion, consider only those parts of the application the applicant wishes to pursue and may impose conditions as necessary for the promotion of the licensing objectives. The authority acted lawfully in determining the application as revised, provided it did not extend the scope of the licence beyond the original application and complied with procedural fairness.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 3467 (Admin)
- Parties
- Appellant: Matthew Taylor; First Respondent: Manchester City Council; Second Respondent: TCG Bars Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court Administrative Court Judgment on Appeal From Magistrates' Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Licensing Act 2003, Premises Licence Variation, Procedural Fairness, Administrative Decision Making
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Matthew Taylor
Appellant
Manchester City Council
First Respondent
TCG Bars Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court Administrative Court Judgment on Appeal From Magistrates' Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether and to what extent an application to vary a premises licence under the Licensing Act 2003 can be amended after advertisement and consultation period has expired
- 2 Whether Manchester City Council acted lawfully in determining a varied application after significant revision post-consultation
Ratio Decidendi
The Licensing Act 2003 and associated regulations do not permit formal amendment of an application to vary a premises licence after submission and advertisement. However, the licensing authority may, in exercising its administrative discretion, consider only those parts of the application the applicant wishes to pursue and may impose conditions as necessary for the promotion of the licensing objectives. The authority acted lawfully in determining the application as revised, provided it did not extend the scope of the licence beyond the original application and complied with procedural fairness.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The decision of the Manchester City Council Licensing Sub-Committee is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment