IG Index Plc v Leung -Cheun & Ors
The daily statements were not margin calls as understood and agreed by the parties; IG Index was not obliged to close out bets under Term 16(4). Deposit requirements were waived by IG Index's conduct and discretion. Defendants' counterclaims fail; IG Index's claim succeeds.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: IG Index PLC; Defendant: Max Leung-Cheun; Defendant: Angela Leung-Cheun; Defendant: Christine Leung-Cheun; Defendant: Donald Leung Cheun; Defendant: Brigitte Leung-Cheun
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim succeeds; counterclaims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Spread Betting, Margin Calls, Deposit Accounts, Contractual Interpretation, Waiver, Breach of Contract, Mitigation of Loss
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
IG Index PLC
Claimant
Max Leung-Cheun
Defendant
Angela Leung-Cheun
Defendant
Christine Leung-Cheun
Defendant
Donald Leung Cheun
Defendant
Brigitte Leung-Cheun
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether daily statements constituted margin calls under the contract
- 2 Whether IG Index was obliged to close out open bets after margin calls
- 3 Whether IG Index breached deposit requirements for new bets
Ratio Decidendi
The daily statements were not margin calls as understood and agreed by the parties; IG Index was not obliged to close out bets under Term 16(4). Deposit requirements were waived by IG Index's conduct and discretion. Defendants' counterclaims fail; IG Index's claim succeeds.
Court Disposition
Claim succeeds; counterclaims dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment