Prior, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 1651 (21 December 2023)
There were no arguable grounds of appeal as the applicant was properly represented, the evidence was admissible and unaltered, and no procedural irregularities affected the fairness of the trial or conviction.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 1651
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Max Perry Manus Prior
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction
- Outcome
- applications refused
- Legal Topics
- Wounding With Intent, Appeal Procedure, Self Defence, Representation at Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Max Perry Manus Prior
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was denied legal representation at police station and court
- 2 Whether the CCTV evidence was improperly used or altered
- 3 Whether witness statements were improperly changed
Ratio Decidendi
There were no arguable grounds of appeal as the applicant was properly represented, the evidence was admissible and unaltered, and no procedural irregularities affected the fairness of the trial or conviction.
Court Disposition
applications refused
Orders
- Application for extension of time refused
- Application for leave to appeal conviction refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment