R v Max Perry Manus Prior

R v Max Perry Manus Prior

There were no arguable grounds of appeal as the applicant was properly represented, the evidence was properly admitted and handled, and no procedural irregularities affected the safety of the conviction.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Applicant: Max Perry Manus Prior
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
applications refused
Legal Topics
Wounding With Intent, Appeal Against Conviction, Extension of Time, Self Defence
Criminal Law Wounding With Intent Appeal Against Conviction Extension of Time Self Defence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Max Perry Manus Prior

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was denied legal representation at the police station and court
  2. 2 Whether the CCTV evidence was of sufficient quality and properly used
  3. 3 Whether the witness statement of Louise Taylor was improperly changed

Ratio Decidendi

There were no arguable grounds of appeal as the applicant was properly represented, the evidence was properly admitted and handled, and no procedural irregularities affected the safety of the conviction.

Court Disposition

applications refused

Orders

  • Application for extension of time refused
  • Application for leave to appeal against conviction refused