Clifford v R
No evidence existed on which the jury could reasonably conclude that any complainant might have consented or that the applicant believed in consent; directions on demeanour, bad character, propensity, collusion, delay, and summing up were adequate and fair; fresh evidence did not imperil conviction; trial was fair and conviction safe.
- Parties
- Applicant: Maxwell Frank Clifford (Deceased); Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Extension of time granted; leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Indecent Assault, Sexual Offences, Appeal Procedure, Fresh Evidence, Delay in Prosecution, Bad Character Evidence, Propensity, Summing Up, Consent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maxwell Frank Clifford (Deceased)
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there were misdirections or inadequate directions on consent and demeanour
- 2 Whether bad character evidence and written material handed to the jury was improper
- 3 Whether the defence case was fairly and equally considered during summing up
Ratio Decidendi
No evidence existed on which the jury could reasonably conclude that any complainant might have consented or that the applicant believed in consent; directions on demeanour, bad character, propensity, collusion, delay, and summing up were adequate and fair; fresh evidence did not imperil conviction; trial was fair and conviction safe.
Court Disposition
Extension of time granted; leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- All applications to adduce fresh evidence refused.
- Conviction stands; no further orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment