McA Catholic High School v CC & Ors
The Tribunal had jurisdiction as IC was not permanently excluded; the proper comparator is a pupil who is not disabled and behaves properly; the Tribunal's comments on exclusion were irrelevant to its finding; the school failed to provide reasonable pastoral support during transitions and unstructured times, constituting discrimination under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.
- Parties
- Appellant: McA Catholic High School; Respondent: CC; Respondent: PC; Respondent: Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Pastoral Support, Reasonable Adjustments, Exclusion of Disabled Pupils, Comparators in Discrimination, Tribunal Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
McA Catholic High School
Appellant
CC
Respondent
PC
Respondent
Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine the complaint
- 2 Proper comparator for discrimination under Disability Discrimination Act 1995
- 3 Whether Tribunal's comments on exclusion affected validity of decision
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal had jurisdiction as IC was not permanently excluded; the proper comparator is a pupil who is not disabled and behaves properly; the Tribunal's comments on exclusion were irrelevant to its finding; the school failed to provide reasonable pastoral support during transitions and unstructured times, constituting discrimination under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- School ordered to produce an action plan for autistic and communication-difficulty pupils
- School to establish a mentoring scheme and, where possible, a buddy system for socially isolated children
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment