Lloyds Bank Plc v McBains Cooper [2016] EWHC 2045 (TCC) (06 October 2016)
McBains Cooper was liable for the sums advanced by Lloyds Bank which would not have been advanced but for McBains Cooper's negligent advice and failure to warn of cost shortfalls and third floor works; however, the Bank was one third contributorily negligent, reducing recoverable damages accordingly.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 2045 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Lloyds Bank plc; Defendant: McBains Cooper
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Damages Assessment Following Liability Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; damages awarded subject to set-off and contributory negligence.
- Legal Topics
- Project Monitoring Liability, Contributory Negligence, Damages Assessment, Scope of Duty (saamco)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lloyds Bank plc
Claimant
McBains Cooper
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Damages Assessment Following Liability Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether McBains Cooper was negligent in its duties as project monitor to Lloyds Bank
- 2 Whether Lloyds Bank relied on McBains Cooper's advice in advancing funds
- 3 Extent of McBains Cooper's liability for losses sustained by the Bank
Ratio Decidendi
McBains Cooper was liable for the sums advanced by Lloyds Bank which would not have been advanced but for McBains Cooper's negligent advice and failure to warn of cost shortfalls and third floor works; however, the Bank was one third contributorily negligent, reducing recoverable damages accordingly.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; damages awarded subject to set-off and contributory negligence.
Orders
- McBains Cooper to pay Lloyds Bank £127,115.95 plus interest at 1.75% per annum from 1 January 2009, with precise interest to be calculated by the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment