Lloyds Bank Plc v McBains Cooper Consulting Ltd [2015] EWHC 2372 (TCC) (02 October 2015)
McBains Cooper was negligent in confirming the adequacy of the facility and failing to report significant variations and costs, but Lloyds Bank also failed to act on clear warnings and did not properly assess the adequacy of the facility. Both parties fell below the standard expected, and liability is apportioned accordingly.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 2372 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Lloyds Bank plc; Defendant: McBains Cooper Consulting Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Negligence Claim / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Liability apportioned; both parties found negligent
- Legal Topics
- Project Monitoring, Duty of Care, Causation, Reliance, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lloyds Bank plc
Claimant
McBains Cooper Consulting Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Negligence Claim / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether McBains Cooper breached its duty of care as project monitor to Lloyds Bank
- 2 Whether Lloyds Bank relied on McBains Cooper's advice
- 3 Causation of loss and apportionment of responsibility
Ratio Decidendi
McBains Cooper was negligent in confirming the adequacy of the facility and failing to report significant variations and costs, but Lloyds Bank also failed to act on clear warnings and did not properly assess the adequacy of the facility. Both parties fell below the standard expected, and liability is apportioned accordingly.
Court Disposition
Liability apportioned; both parties found negligent
Orders
- McBains Cooper liable for negligent advice and reporting; damages to be assessed
- Lloyds Bank's own negligence reduces recoverable damages
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment