Lynda Joseph v McFaddens LLP
The Judge was entitled to conclude that the three-day delay in serving Particulars of Claim was serious and significant, particularly given its effect of rendering the claim statute-barred and depriving the Respondent of a limitation defence; the appeal must fail as the Judge's decision was within the range of reasonable views.
- Parties
- Claimant: Lynda Joseph; Defendant: McFaddens LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Relief From Sanctions, Extension of Time, Limitation Period, Service of Particulars of Claim
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lynda Joseph
Claimant
McFaddens LLP
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a three-day delay in serving Particulars of Claim was 'serious and significant' under the Denton test
- 2 Whether the Judge erred in refusing a retrospective extension of time for service of Particulars of Claim
Ratio Decidendi
The Judge was entitled to conclude that the three-day delay in serving Particulars of Claim was serious and significant, particularly given its effect of rendering the claim statute-barred and depriving the Respondent of a limitation defence; the appeal must fail as the Judge's decision was within the range of reasonable views.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; no extension of time granted for service of Particulars of Claim
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment