WW Gear Construction Ltd v McGee Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1460 (TCC) (21 June 2010)
Clause 4.21.1, as amended, imposes a condition precedent requiring the Contractor to submit a written, fully documented, and costed application for loss and expense within the specified time (no later than two months after it became or should have become apparent that progress was affected). Compliance with this requirement is a precondition to entitlement under Clause 4.21. The wording, though poorly drafted, is to be construed as referring to Clause 4.21 as a whole, and the application triggers the ascertainment process for loss and expense. The Contractor has no entitlement under Clause 4.21 unless the condition precedent is satisfied.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 1460 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: WW Gear Construction Limited; Defendant: McGee Group Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Claim for Final Declarations (construction Contract) / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Declaration granted in favour of the Employer.
- Legal Topics
- Conditions Precedent in Construction Contracts, Interpretation of JCT Standard Form Contracts, Loss and Expense Claims, Contractual Notice Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WW Gear Construction Limited
Claimant
McGee Group Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Claim for Final Declarations (construction Contract) / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether compliance with Clause 4.21.1 is a condition precedent to entitlement to loss and expense under Clause 4.21 of the amended JCT Trade Contract.
- 2 Proper construction and effect of the wording in Clause 4.21.1 regarding timely application for loss and expense.
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 4.21.1, as amended, imposes a condition precedent requiring the Contractor to submit a written, fully documented, and costed application for loss and expense within the specified time (no later than two months after it became or should have become apparent that progress was affected). Compliance with this requirement is a precondition to entitlement under Clause 4.21. The wording, though poorly drafted, is to be construed as referring to Clause 4.21 as a whole, and the application triggers the ascertainment process for loss and expense. The Contractor has no entitlement under Clause 4.21 unless the condition precedent is satisfied.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted in favour of the Employer.
Orders
- It is declared that the Contractor was required to comply with the provisions of Clause 4.21.1 as a condition precedent to its entitlement to loss and expense under Clause 4.21.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment