The Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform v Meade
Mr Meade failed to demonstrate that his continued presence as director is critical to the survival of Hadleigh Partners Limited or its subsidiaries, or to the maintenance of banking facilities. The risk of recurrence of conduct leading to disqualification remains. Limited leave under section 17 is granted for a short period to allow transition.
- Parties
- Claimant: Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform; Defendant: Meade
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Disqualification Application / Judgment on Section 17 Application
- Outcome
- Section 17 leave granted for a limited period; application for postponement of disqualification order refused.
- Legal Topics
- Director Disqualification, Section 17 Leave, Banking Facilities, Management of Companies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform
Claimant
Meade
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Disqualification Application / Judgment on Section 17 Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Meade should be granted leave under section 17 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 to act as director of Hadleigh Partners Limited
- 2 Whether postponement of the disqualification order is justified
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Meade failed to demonstrate that his continued presence as director is critical to the survival of Hadleigh Partners Limited or its subsidiaries, or to the maintenance of banking facilities. The risk of recurrence of conduct leading to disqualification remains. Limited leave under section 17 is granted for a short period to allow transition.
Court Disposition
Section 17 leave granted for a limited period; application for postponement of disqualification order refused.
Orders
- Mr Meade granted leave under section 17 to act as director of Hadleigh Partners Limited for a short period to arrange transition.
- No postponement of the disqualification order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment