Mears Ltd v Costplan Services (South East) Ltd & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 502 (29 March 2019)
Clause 6.2.1 of the AFL deems materiality only in relation to room size, not the breach itself. Any breach of the 3% tolerance is a breach of contract, but whether it is material or substantial is a matter of fact and degree. Practical completion is not prevented by every breach; only non-trifling defects or breaches prevent certification. Irremediability of defects is irrelevant to practical completion. The appeal is dismissed; declarations sought by Mears are refused.
- Citation
- [2019] EWCA Civ 502
- Parties
- Appellant: Mears Limited; 1st Respondent: Costplan Services (South East) Limited; 2nd Respondent: Plymouth (Notte Street) Limited; 3rd Respondent: J. R. Pickstock Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Practical Completion, Material Breach, Contract Interpretation, Remedies for Breach
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mears Limited
Appellant
Costplan Services (South East) Limited
1st Respondent
Plymouth (Notte Street) Limited
2nd Respondent
J. R. Pickstock Limited
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether any breach of clause 6.2.1 of the Agreement for Lease (AFL) constitutes a material and substantial breach entitling Mears to terminate or preventing certification of practical completion
- 2 Whether practical completion can be certified where there are known material or substantial defects or breaches
- 3 Whether irremediable defects prevent practical completion
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 6.2.1 of the AFL deems materiality only in relation to room size, not the breach itself. Any breach of the 3% tolerance is a breach of contract, but whether it is material or substantial is a matter of fact and degree. Practical completion is not prevented by every breach; only non-trifling defects or breaches prevent certification. Irremediability of defects is irrelevant to practical completion. The appeal is dismissed; declarations sought by Mears are refused.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Refusal to grant Declarations 1-4 as sought by Mears
- Declaration 5 (breach of AFL) stands; no appeal against it
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment