Crammond v Medway NHS Foundation Trust

Crammond v Medway NHS Foundation Trust

The Accident and Emergency doctor breached the duty of care by failing to obtain a sufficient history and identify risk factors before streaming the claimant to the SDTC. A reasonable doctor would have admitted the claimant for further investigation, which would have revealed his cardiac condition and prevented...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Mr John David Crammond; Defendant: Medway NHS Foundation Trust
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 December 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Medical Negligence / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant
Legal Topics
Standard of Care, Hospital Protocols, Causation, Duty of Care
Tort Law Medical Negligence Standard of Care Hospital Protocols Causation Duty of Care

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr John David Crammond

Claimant

Medway NHS Foundation Trust

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Medical Negligence / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Accident and Emergency doctor breached the duty of care by streaming the claimant to the Same Day Treatment Centre without obtaining a full history and identifying risk factors.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant should have been admitted for further investigation based on his symptoms and risk factors.

Ratio Decidendi

The Accident and Emergency doctor breached the duty of care by failing to obtain a sufficient history and identify risk factors before streaming the claimant to the SDTC. A reasonable doctor would have admitted the claimant for further investigation, which would have revealed his cardiac condition and prevented later severe complications.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • Damages to be assessed or agreed