Dandara South East Limited v Medway Preservation Limited & Anor
The expert determination clause in the contract is broad and applies to all disputes under or in connection with the contract, including the present dispute regarding termination and repayment of the deposit. The clause is separable from the main contract for the purposes of determining whether the contract has been terminated by a supervening event. The claimant has not established that the expert determination process is unsuitable for the dispute or that any exceptional circumstances exist to refuse a stay. Accordingly, the court will stay the proceedings to enable expert determination as agreed by the parties.
- Parties
- Claimant: Dandara South East Limited; Defendant: Medway Preservation Limited; Defendant: Medway Preservation & Development Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial/property) / Interlocutory Application for Stay Pending Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Application granted; proceedings stayed for expert determination
- Legal Topics
- Expert Determination Clauses, Jurisdiction, Separability of Dispute Resolution Clauses, Stay of Proceedings, Construction of Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dandara South East Limited
Claimant
Medway Preservation Limited
Defendant
Medway Preservation & Development Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial/property) / Interlocutory Application for Stay Pending Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the expert determination clause in the contract applies to the present dispute
- 2 Whether the expert determination clause is separable from the main contract
- 3 Whether the dispute is suitable for expert determination under the contract
Ratio Decidendi
The expert determination clause in the contract is broad and applies to all disputes under or in connection with the contract, including the present dispute regarding termination and repayment of the deposit. The clause is separable from the main contract for the purposes of determining whether the contract has been terminated by a supervening event. The claimant has not established that the expert determination process is unsuitable for the dispute or that any exceptional circumstances exist to refuse a stay. Accordingly, the court will stay the proceedings to enable expert determination as agreed by the parties.
Court Disposition
Application granted; proceedings stayed for expert determination
Orders
- The claim is stayed to enable the parties to comply with clause 28 of the contract (expert determination procedure).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment