Agarwal v Cardiff University & Anor
Employment Tribunals have jurisdiction to interpret and apply employment contracts when determining unauthorised deduction of wages claims under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The concession issue does not preclude the appellant from raising the jurisdiction point on appeal. The collective agreement in...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Meena Agarwal; First Respondent: Cardiff University; Second Respondent: Cardiff and Vale University Health Board; Appellant: Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Executive t/a Nexus; Respondents: Steven Anderson and others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeals From the Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- Agarwal: Appeal allowed; Nexus: Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Employment Tribunal Jurisdiction, Unauthorised Deduction of Wages, Contractual Interpretation, Employment Contract, Collective Agreement, Statutory Construction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Meena Agarwal
Appellant
Cardiff University
First Respondent
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
Second Respondent
Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Executive t/a Nexus
Appellant
Steven Anderson and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeals From the Employment Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal has jurisdiction to resolve disputes about the construction of a contract of employment in the context of a claim for unauthorised deduction of wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- 2 Whether a concession made in the Employment Tribunal precludes the appellant from raising the jurisdiction issue on appeal
- 3 Proper construction of a collective agreement affecting calculation of shift allowance
Ratio Decidendi
Employment Tribunals have jurisdiction to interpret and apply employment contracts when determining unauthorised deduction of wages claims under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The concession issue does not preclude the appellant from raising the jurisdiction point on appeal. The collective agreement in Nexus unambiguously increased basic pay for all purposes, including shift allowance calculation, regardless of the employer's intention of cost-neutrality.
Court Disposition
Agarwal: Appeal allowed; Nexus: Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted to Ms Agarwal
- Agarwal: Employment Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine the claim; matter remitted for determination on the merits
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment