Oyesanya v Jackson [2020] EWHC 542 (Ch) (12 March 2020)
The district judge made no error of law or procedure in refusing adjournment, extension of time for medical evidence, or possession order; applicant's arguments lacked merit, and no compelling reason for appeal exists.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 542 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Olufunso Abiodun Oyesanya; Respondent: Melissa Lorraine Jackson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Rolled Up Application for Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy, Possession Order, Adjournment, Relief From Sanctions, Costs and Expenses, Article 6 ECHR
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Olufunso Abiodun Oyesanya
Applicant/appellant
Melissa Lorraine Jackson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Rolled Up Application for Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the refusal to adjourn the hearing on medical grounds was erroneous
- 2 Whether the refusal to extend time for serving medical evidence was erroneous
- 3 Whether the possession and sale order was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The district judge made no error of law or procedure in refusing adjournment, extension of time for medical evidence, or possession order; applicant's arguments lacked merit, and no compelling reason for appeal exists.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Stay of possession order and suspension of warrant lifted; possession order and warrant may be enforced.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment