Saunders v The Queen (Bahamas)

Saunders v The Queen (Bahamas)

Any request for DNA samples for independent analysis was not pursued by the defence; there was no denial of opportunity or non-disclosure. The judge properly directed the jury on the standard of proof and corroboration. The summing up, though containing some unfortunate language, did not mislead the jury or render the trial unfair. The conviction was safe.

Parties
Appellant: Melvin Saunders; Respondent: The Queen
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 January 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appeal Before Privy Council
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Rape, DNA Evidence, Fair Trial, Corroboration, Standard of Proof, Summation, Public Funding
Criminal Law Rape DNA Evidence Fair Trial Corroboration Standard of Proof Summation Public Funding

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Melvin Saunders

Appellant

The Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appeal Before Privy Council

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defence was denied access to DNA samples for independent analysis
  2. 2 Whether there was misdirection on the standard of proof
  3. 3 Whether the judge's summing up was unfair

Ratio Decidendi

Any request for DNA samples for independent analysis was not pursued by the defence; there was no denial of opportunity or non-disclosure. The judge properly directed the jury on the standard of proof and corroboration. The summing up, though containing some unfortunate language, did not mislead the jury or render the trial unfair. The conviction was safe.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The conviction and sentence are affirmed.