Aldemir v Cornwall Council
Section 181(2) of the Licensing Act 2003 empowers magistrates to make costs orders against non-parties, but such orders must be made following a fair procedure. In this case, the lack of notice and opportunity to respond rendered the procedure unfair, requiring the costs orders to be set aside and reconsidered.
- Parties
- Appellant: Memet Aldemir; Respondent: Cornwall Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Non Party Costs, Natural Justice, Appeals From Licensing Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Memet Aldemir
Appellant
Cornwall Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 181(2) of the Licensing Act 2003 empower magistrates to make costs orders against non-parties?
- 2 Was a fair procedure followed in making the costs order against Mr Aldemir?
- 3 Was it reasonable to make a costs order against Mr Aldemir?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 181(2) of the Licensing Act 2003 empowers magistrates to make costs orders against non-parties, but such orders must be made following a fair procedure. In this case, the lack of notice and opportunity to respond rendered the procedure unfair, requiring the costs orders to be set aside and reconsidered.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The costs orders made against Mr Aldemir are set aside.
- The applications for costs are to be reconsidered by the District Judge.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment