Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Ors
The court finds that the issue of the proper law governing the Agreement is reasonably self-contained, necessary to resolve, and its determination as a preliminary issue will assist both parties and the court in focusing trial preparation and evidence. The advantages outweigh the disadvantages, and the order for a preliminary issue is appropriate.
- Parties
- Claimant: MERCK KGaA; Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP; Defendant: MERCK & CO, INC.; Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME LIMITED; Defendant: INTERVET UK LIMITED; Defendant: INTERVET INTERNATIONAL BV
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial / Application for Trial of Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Proper Law of Contract, Trade Mark Infringement, Case Management, Preliminary Issues
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MERCK KGaA
Claimant
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP
Defendant
MERCK & CO, INC.
Defendant
MERCK SHARP & DOHME LIMITED
Defendant
INTERVET UK LIMITED
Defendant
INTERVET INTERNATIONAL BV
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Application for Trial of Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the proper law governing the 1970 Agreement between the parties?
- 2 Should the issue of proper law be tried as a preliminary issue?
Ratio Decidendi
The court finds that the issue of the proper law governing the Agreement is reasonably self-contained, necessary to resolve, and its determination as a preliminary issue will assist both parties and the court in focusing trial preparation and evidence. The advantages outweigh the disadvantages, and the order for a preliminary issue is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Order for trial of preliminary issue as to the proper law governing the Agreement
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment